Social Security stop-gap debate revs up
By Richard Wolf, USA TODAY
October 15, 2009
WASHINGTON — President Obama's plan to send $250
checks to more than 50 million Social Security recipients who won't get
cost-of-living adjustments in January is gathering support in Congress,
but outside experts and budget watchdogs say the payments are
unjustified.
The Social Security Administration announced as expected
Thursday that there will be no adjustment, or COLA, for the first time
since automatic boosts were instituted in 1975. That's because inflation
was negative for the past 12 months.
Obama's proposal would include seniors, people with
disabilities, veterans and retired railroad workers, bringing the total
cost to between $13 billion and $14 billion.
Experts on Social Security blasted the plan, both as
a replacement for the COLA and as a way to stimulate the economy. Seniors
don't deserve the money without inflation, they said, and don't need it as
much as those laid off in the recession.
"We've gotten so used to dispensing hundreds of
billions of dollars that we don't think now before spending $13 billion,"
said Alicia Munnell, director of the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College. "I see no intellectual reason for this
payment."
Seniors' groups argued the one-time payments are
justified because, although inflation has been flat, medical costs have
risen by more than 3%. "Seniors aren't buying iPods," said Barbara Kennelly, president of the National Committee to
Preserve Social Security and Medicare. "They're staying healthy by buying
prescription drugs."
Thursday's announcement came as no surprise. By law,
cost-of-living adjustments are tied to inflation, which declined as fuel
costs dropped. Last year's COLA was 5.8%.
Social Security Commissioner Michael Astrue defended
the payments as a wedge against medical costs that he said have risen "at
a rate of inflation much higher than any other commodity."
The $250 would equal what was sent to Social Security
beneficiaries in spring as part of the two-year, $787 billion economic
stimulus law. Workers got $400 tax credits — $800 for couples — for 2009
and 2010, but seniors got one-time payments.
Obama has been seeking other ways to stimulate the
economy short of a second major stimulus package, and Astrue said this is
one way to do it. "Both in theory and in practice, you send money out to
this group, they are going to spend it," he said.
Democratic leaders such as House Speaker Nancy Pelosi endorsed the payments. Republicans such as
House GOP leader John Boehner said the funds should be paid for rather
than added to the deficit.
That scenario is unlikely, said Sen. Judd Gregg, top Republican on the Budget Committee: "It's a terrible
idea if it's not paid for, because it goes right toward the debt."